Cybersecurity · Development · Managed services

Secure it. Build it. Run it.

A security-first technology partner for mid-market enterprises — sized to work with you directly, and fast enough that people ask how. The answer is that AI is in how we work, not just what we work on.

Book a discovery call Take the assessment
SECURE · BUILD · RUN
Three offerings

One ridge, three summits.

Most firms sell you one of these and leave you to manage the seams. We work across the lifecycle — which means the people who secured it are the people who built it and the people who run it.

Secure it

Cybersecurity

Posture, governance, and compliance from a security-led practice. The anchor offering, and usually where relationships start.

  • Security posture assessments
  • AI governance & GRC frameworks
  • Compliance mapping & evidence
  • AI-specific risk assessments
  • Fractional CISO advisory
What we assess →
Build it

Software Development

Custom applications, integrations, and AI features — built by a team that reviews its own work the way an auditor would.

  • Custom application development
  • System integration & APIs
  • AI features inside your product
  • Legacy modernization
  • Secure SDLC by default
How we build →
Run it

Managed Services

Ongoing capacity for organizations that would rather have a partner than a vendor. Deliberately limited — we take a small number.

  • AI enablement & adoption programs
  • Governance oversight & reporting
  • Application support & maintenance
  • Fractional technical advisory
  • Roadmap ownership
How retainers work →
Start here, free

Find out where you actually stand.

Twelve questions, about six minutes. You get a maturity read across six dimensions, your three widest gaps, and a recommended starting point — security, build, or run. No call required to see your result.

Take the readiness assessment
POSTURE GRC RISK BUILD OPS AI USE CURRENT ▪ TARGET —
Sample output · six dimensions, 1–4 scale
Why we're faster than our size

Everyone says they do AI. Fewer will say where.

Most firms mean AI is the subject — they'll help you adopt it. We mean that too. But the claim that actually matters is the other one: AI is in our own delivery, which is why a deliberately small firm quotes timelines that look like a much larger one. Here is specifically where.

$50M–$500M

Where we work. Big enough to carry real exposure, small enough that Big 4 engagements don't fit the problem or the budget.

Security-led

Security isn't a service line we bolted on. It's the lens every offering was designed through.

You own it

Code, frameworks, documentation, methodology. Built for your context and yours outright. No licensing, no lock-in.

Audit or customer questionnaire landed Board asking about AI risk Build backlog outrunning the team Shadow AI spreading Legacy system nobody wants to touch Licenses bought, adoption flat No one owns it after hours
Talk it through Discovery calls are free · 45 minutes
AI as method

Four places it changes the economics.

Not a claim about capability — a claim about cost structure. These are the places the work genuinely compresses, and they're the reason our proposals look the way they do.

01

Discovery

Weeks → days

Policy sets, codebases, and control libraries get read and cross-referenced in hours. We arrive at the first workshop already knowing what your documents say.

02

Build

Scaffolding, not judgment

Boilerplate, test coverage, and migration scaffolding are generated and then reviewed by a human who is accountable for them. Architecture stays a human decision.

03

Evidence

Generated, not reconstructed

Control mappings, audit artifacts, and runbooks are produced as work happens instead of assembled from memory the week before an audit.

04

Documentation

Actually current

The reason handoff documentation is usually stale is that writing it is nobody's favorite job. That constraint is largely gone, so ours stays accurate.

Secure · Build · Run
One shared ridge
Why "Three Peak"

Three summits, one ridge.

The mark is three peaks sharing their edges, ascending left to right. That's the firm: secure it, build it, run it. Not three unrelated businesses under one roof — three stages of the same climb, which is why the handoffs between them don't leak.

The security peak comes first deliberately. Software written without a security lens becomes someone's incident. Systems run without governance become someone's audit finding. Getting the order right is most of the job.

Founded in Colorado by a security-focused technology veteran who spent a career on the defending side before AI made the terrain unrecognizable.

How engagements run

Four phases. Every one has a gate.

The same phase vocabulary runs across all three offerings, so a client who starts in security already knows how a build will feel. Nothing advances until the gate is signed.

01 — Discovery

Understand before proposing

Stakeholder interviews, system inventory, current-state assessment, and a scope you can approve with confidence.

Gate: written sign-off on scope, approach, and success metrics.
02 — Design

Built from your context

Architecture, controls, and workflows designed from first principles against your actual risk profile and constraints.

Gate: internal QA complete, ready for real-world testing.
03 — Validation

Tested against reality

Piloted on live systems and real users. Friction, ambiguity, and edge cases surface here, where they're still cheap to fix.

Gate: formal acceptance, no unresolved critical issues.
04 — Handoff

You operate it, not us

Training, documentation, runbooks, and a measurement baseline. Success is your team running this without calling us.

Gate: team trained, documentation accepted, baseline captured.
How we work

Four commitments, and one thing we won't do.

Security-first, not security-later

Controls, logging, and data handling are designed in from week one. Bolting them on after go-live costs more and works worse, every time.

A human is accountable

AI accelerates our work; it doesn't sign off on it. Every artifact that reaches you was reviewed by someone whose name is on the engagement.

You own the IP

Code, frameworks, methodology, documentation — built for your organization and yours outright. Nothing licensed back, nothing dependent on us staying.

Never compliance theater

A binder nobody opens is worse than no framework — it creates the belief you're covered when you aren't. If a control doesn't change a decision, it doesn't ship.